Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

Blog Article

Taking an individual’s life is usually a heinous crime that devastates family members, communities, and society in general. The harsh punishment serves for a deterrent to possible offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.

In accordance with the EPA charge schedule, the request should be limited in scope, rather than be meant for redistribution on the internet or for commercial purposes. 

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it appropriate for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Note: Please fill any subject and Click on Search button, if you do not know the complete information please leave field blank.

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.

Permit’s deal with what the Prosecution must prove in order to gain a conviction. There are four elements that must be proven.

The Court deemed the case to get maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the danger and encroachment alleged were including to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more

When click here the petitioner is just present on the place of event without causing any injury towards the deceased or PWs then in this kind of circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided by the learned trial Court after recording of the evidence.

Alternative Punishment: In certain cases, the court may perhaps have the discretion to award life imprisonment being an alternative to your death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life driving bars without the possibility of parole or early release.

one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence plus the separation of powers.

A reduced court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to become healthy for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)